Chinese General Practice ›› 2024, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (06): 699-703.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0318
• Original Research • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2023-03-20
Revised:
2023-06-10
Published:
2024-02-20
Online:
2023-11-21
Contact:
ZOU Liying
通讯作者:
邹丽颖
作者简介:
基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0318
组别 | 例数 | 年龄(岁) | 分娩孕周(周) |
---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 987 | 31.05±3.08 | 39.03±0.91 |
发热组 | 994 | 31.06±3.13 | 39.06±0.92 |
t值 | 1.503 | 1.022 | |
P值 | 0.979 | 0.465 |
Table 1 Comparison of general data between the fever group and control group
组别 | 例数 | 年龄(岁) | 分娩孕周(周) |
---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 987 | 31.05±3.08 | 39.03±0.91 |
发热组 | 994 | 31.06±3.13 | 39.06±0.92 |
t值 | 1.503 | 1.022 | |
P值 | 0.979 | 0.465 |
组别 | 例数 | 催引产 | 催引产时间≥3 d | PROM | HDCP | GDM |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 987 | 368(37.28) | 67(6.79) | 173(17.53) | 11(1.11) | 97(9.83) |
发热组 | 994 | 420(42.25) | 106(10.66) | 328(33.00) | 23(2.31) | 130(13.08) |
χ2值 | 5.104 | 9.334 | 62.730 | 4.223 | 5.158 | |
P值 | 0.024 | 0.002 | <0.001 | 0.040 | 0.023 |
Table 2 Comparison of pregnancy complications and labor induction between the fever group and control group
组别 | 例数 | 催引产 | 催引产时间≥3 d | PROM | HDCP | GDM |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 987 | 368(37.28) | 67(6.79) | 173(17.53) | 11(1.11) | 97(9.83) |
发热组 | 994 | 420(42.25) | 106(10.66) | 328(33.00) | 23(2.31) | 130(13.08) |
χ2值 | 5.104 | 9.334 | 62.730 | 4.223 | 5.158 | |
P值 | 0.024 | 0.002 | <0.001 | 0.040 | 0.023 |
组别 | 例数 | 剖宫产[例(%)] | 产褥感染[例(%)] | 新生儿体质量(g) | 新生儿窒息[例(%)] | 羊水污染[例(%)] | 新生儿转NICU[例(%)] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 987 | 114(11.55) | 5(0.51) | 3 483.52±389.18 | 6(0.61) | 13(1.32) | 121(12.26) |
发热组 | 994 | 340(34.21) | 14(1.41) | 3 485.34±347.71 | 16(1.61) | 28(2.82) | 160(16.10) |
χ2(t)值 | 143.888 | 4.241 | 1.676a | 4.525 | 5.496 | 5.991 | |
P值 | <0.001 | 0.039 | 0.634 | 0.033 | 0.019 | 0.014 |
Table 3 Maternal outcome and neonatal status in both two groups
组别 | 例数 | 剖宫产[例(%)] | 产褥感染[例(%)] | 新生儿体质量(g) | 新生儿窒息[例(%)] | 羊水污染[例(%)] | 新生儿转NICU[例(%)] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 987 | 114(11.55) | 5(0.51) | 3 483.52±389.18 | 6(0.61) | 13(1.32) | 121(12.26) |
发热组 | 994 | 340(34.21) | 14(1.41) | 3 485.34±347.71 | 16(1.61) | 28(2.82) | 160(16.10) |
χ2(t)值 | 143.888 | 4.241 | 1.676a | 4.525 | 5.496 | 5.991 | |
P值 | <0.001 | 0.039 | 0.634 | 0.033 | 0.019 | 0.014 |
组别 | 例数 | 年龄(岁) | 分娩孕周(周) |
---|---|---|---|
第1亚组 | 142 | 31.20±2.94 | 39.23±1.01 |
第2亚组 | 600 | 31.09±3.17 | 39.38±0.94 |
第3亚组 | 213 | 30.90±3.07 | 39.40±1.00 |
第4亚组 | 39 | 30.06±3.13 | 39.36±0.97 |
F值 | 0.335 | 1.063 | |
P值 | 0.800 | 0.364 |
Table 4 Comparison of general data among the four subgroups
组别 | 例数 | 年龄(岁) | 分娩孕周(周) |
---|---|---|---|
第1亚组 | 142 | 31.20±2.94 | 39.23±1.01 |
第2亚组 | 600 | 31.09±3.17 | 39.38±0.94 |
第3亚组 | 213 | 30.90±3.07 | 39.40±1.00 |
第4亚组 | 39 | 30.06±3.13 | 39.36±0.97 |
F值 | 0.335 | 1.063 | |
P值 | 0.800 | 0.364 |
组别 | 例数 | 催引产 | 催引产时间≥3 d | PROM | HDCP | GDM |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
第1亚组 | 142 | 62(43.66) | 19(13.38) | 46(32.39) | 6(4.23) | 18(12.68) |
第2亚组 | 600 | 254(42.33) | 60(10.00) | 209(34.83) | 12(2.00) | 86(14.33) |
第3亚组 | 213 | 85(39.91) | 23(10.80) | 59(27.70) | 4(1.88) | 22(10.33) |
第4亚组 | 39 | 19(48.72) | 4(10.26) | 14(35.90) | 1(2.56) | 4(10.26) |
χ2值 | 1.266 | 1.388 | 3.790 | 3.462 | 2.541 | |
P值 | 0.737 | 0.708 | 0.285 | 0.326 | 0.468 |
Table 5 Comparison of pregnancy complications and labor induction among the four subgroups
组别 | 例数 | 催引产 | 催引产时间≥3 d | PROM | HDCP | GDM |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
第1亚组 | 142 | 62(43.66) | 19(13.38) | 46(32.39) | 6(4.23) | 18(12.68) |
第2亚组 | 600 | 254(42.33) | 60(10.00) | 209(34.83) | 12(2.00) | 86(14.33) |
第3亚组 | 213 | 85(39.91) | 23(10.80) | 59(27.70) | 4(1.88) | 22(10.33) |
第4亚组 | 39 | 19(48.72) | 4(10.26) | 14(35.90) | 1(2.56) | 4(10.26) |
χ2值 | 1.266 | 1.388 | 3.790 | 3.462 | 2.541 | |
P值 | 0.737 | 0.708 | 0.285 | 0.326 | 0.468 |
组别 | 例数 | 剖宫产[例(%)] | 产褥感染[例(%)] | 新生儿体质量(g) | 新生儿窒息[例(%)] | 羊水污染[例(%)] | 新生儿转NICU[例(%)] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
第1亚组 | 142 | 47(33.10) | 3(2.10) | 3 422.22±367.25 | 3(2.11) | 7(4.93) | 19(13.40) |
第2亚组 | 600 | 206(34.33) | 7(1.20) | 3 501.98±374.96 | 8(1.33) | 15(2.50) | 102(17.00) |
第3亚组 | 213 | 68(31.92) | 4(1.90) | 3 492.96±380.09 | 5(2.35) | 6(2.82) | 36(16.90) |
第4亚组 | 39 | 19(48.72) | 0 | 3 485.34±374.03 | 0 | 0 | 3(7.70) |
χ2(F)值 | 4.224 | 1.660 | 2.202a | 1.175 | 2.394 | 3.28 | |
P值 | 0.238 | 0.647 | 0.086 | 0.556 | 0.302 | 0.350 |
Table 6 Mode of delivery and neonatal status of the four subgroups
组别 | 例数 | 剖宫产[例(%)] | 产褥感染[例(%)] | 新生儿体质量(g) | 新生儿窒息[例(%)] | 羊水污染[例(%)] | 新生儿转NICU[例(%)] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
第1亚组 | 142 | 47(33.10) | 3(2.10) | 3 422.22±367.25 | 3(2.11) | 7(4.93) | 19(13.40) |
第2亚组 | 600 | 206(34.33) | 7(1.20) | 3 501.98±374.96 | 8(1.33) | 15(2.50) | 102(17.00) |
第3亚组 | 213 | 68(31.92) | 4(1.90) | 3 492.96±380.09 | 5(2.35) | 6(2.82) | 36(16.90) |
第4亚组 | 39 | 19(48.72) | 0 | 3 485.34±374.03 | 0 | 0 | 3(7.70) |
χ2(F)值 | 4.224 | 1.660 | 2.202a | 1.175 | 2.394 | 3.28 | |
P值 | 0.238 | 0.647 | 0.086 | 0.556 | 0.302 | 0.350 |
[1] |
|
[2] |
戴满花. 血清β-hCG、IGFBP-1联合TNF-α检测对胎膜早破宫内感染患者的诊断价值[J]. 中国妇幼保健,2019,34(14):3200-3202.
|
[3] |
成静. 血清β-人绒毛膜促性腺激素联合超敏C反应蛋白在胎膜早破宫内感染诊断中的应用[J]. 医疗装备,2019,32(12):42-43.
|
[4] |
刘彩丽,司雯,牛萍. 孕中期初产妇血清AFP、β-HCG、uE3、Inhibin-A联合检测对不良妊娠结局的指导作用[J]. 泰山医学院学报,2018,39(3):330-331. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-7115.2018.03.034.
|
[5] |
徐志林,胡晓莉,徐庆丰. 低浓度罗哌卡因阴道分娩镇痛对产妇产期发热及致热因子的影响[J]. 实用临床医药杂志,2020,24(1):105-108. DOI:10.7619/jcmp.202001027.
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
钟媛媛,刘丽平,周洁琼. 妊娠晚期孕妇生殖道B族链球菌定植对生殖道微生态的影响及妊娠结局分析[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志,2021,29(7):1392-1395. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-8189.2021.07.018.
|
[8] |
段然,曹珑璐,容俊芳. 硬膜外分娩镇痛时产妇发热的病因分析研究进展:文献综述[J]. 中华疼痛学杂志,2020,16(6):523-528.
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
黄丽华,梁曼. 硬膜外麻醉分娩镇痛对初产妇分娩结局及产时发热影响的回顾性分析[J]. 护士进修杂志,2020,35(16):1495-1498. DOI:10.16821/j.cnki.hsjx.2020.16.014.
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
答卫,唐杰. 小剂量罗哌卡因复合舒芬太尼在自控硬膜外分娩镇痛中的应用效果[J]. 实用临床医药杂志,2020,24(9):108-110.
|
[17] |
陈嵩涛,石阳,旦增江白,等. 西藏地区无痛分娩的应用效果及临床研究[J]. 中国医师杂志,2020,22(11):1645-1648; 1645-1648,1653.
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
李欣桐,李彩娟,张媛,等. 产间发热相关因素的研究进展[J]. 医学综述,2021,27(17):3439-3444. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-2084.2021.17.020.
|
[20] |
王琳,闻明,张云,等. 硬膜外相关产时发热对产妇炎症应激反应、母婴结局的影响[J]. 中国现代医学杂志,2022,32(18):95-100. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-8982.2022.18.015.
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[1] | WEN Jing, ZHANG Yue, LIANG Xuyang, LYU Shengxiang. Study on the Influencing Factors of Gastric Cancer Based on Opportunistic Screening of Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer in Coastal Area of Northern Jiangsu [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(09): 1042-1047. |
[2] | WEN Wen, ZHANG Kainan, CHEN Yulan, LI Yu, ZHANG Xiangyang. Correlation of Metabolic Indexes as Predictors with Obstructive Sleep Apnea [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(30): 3740-3747. |
[3] | HE Manlan, YUAN Ping, HE Lei, CHEN Lu. Meta-analysis of Risk Factors for Urinary Tract Infection in Neurogenic Bladder [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(21): 2659-2665. |
[4] | ZHAI Leilei, ZHAO Shupeng, YAO Ping. Meta-analysis of the Relationship between Dietary Inflammatory Index and Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Risks [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(18): 2286-2292. |
[5] | ZHANG Yutong, WANG Qiuqin, XU Yuchen, WENG Heng, LIANG Yongqi, WANG Lulu, WANG Qing, XU Guihua. Factors Affecting Pain in Patients with Parkinson's Disease: a Systematic Review [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(14): 1766-1774. |
[6] | GE Xuhong, HU Jieyi, BAI Yunrui, WANG Lu, LENG Song. Association between Triglyceride-glucose Index and Its Derivatives Index and the Development of Type 2 Diabetes: a Nested Case-control Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(12): 1456-1462. |
[7] | GUO Yinning, MIAO Xueyi, JIANG Xiaoman, XU Ting, XU Qin. Associated Factors of Frailty in Cancer Patients: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(08): 989-996. |
[8] | ZHANG Weizong, YUAN Hong, SUN Jindong, YU Huamin, SHI Mingjuan, HU Haiqiang, HE Haiying, YE Li, ZHANG Huihui, BAI Xinghua, SHEN Chaofeng, TU Sijia, WANG Yang, WANG Gang, ZHAO Xiaofeng, YU Tao, LI Cairong, ZHANG Zhi, ZHOU Donglai, CAI Mengyang, NING Le. Risk Factors of In-hospital Death in COVID-19 Patients: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(05): 607-620. |
[9] | LIU Shuangxue, LI Yanhua, ZHANG Gangwei, ZHAO Lin. Risk Factors for Postmenopausal Hypertension: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(04): 512-518. |
[10] | YU Zhumei, LIU Annuo, XIAO Juan, TANG Yuxia, YU Li, TONG Huanhuan. Risk Factors for Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Premature Infants: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(03): 356-366. |
[11] | HUANGFU Xiaojuan, LI Xiaojuan, CHEN Min, LIU Jihong, ZHAI Rui, CAI Zhipeng, LI Litao. A Meta-analysis of the Impact of COVID-19 on Stroke Mortality [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(03): 348-355. |
[12] | TANG Chong, ZENG Shufei, LIANG Hanwen, WANG Jiajia, ZOU Hui, CAI Lidan, ZHANG Bin. Comparative Study of Cognitive Function in Inpatients with Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Healthy Controls [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(35): 4399-4405. |
[13] | XIONG Bin, ZHOU Yun, WANG Hua, ZHANG Quanbing, LIU Yi, LI Kai, ZHENG Haoran, WANG Jing, WANG Qunan. Distribution Pattern of Dynamic Plantar Pressure in Patients with Traumatic Extension Knee Contracture [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(32): 4052-4058. |
[14] | Xiaoyan ZHU, Yuncong HUANG, Qian HUANG, Jie GU, Haiying CHEN, Lan TANG, Zhaoxin WANG, Jiaoling HUANG. The Construction of an Evaluation Index System for Operation of Fever Alertness Clinics Based on Grounded Theory [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(25): 3143-3149. |
[15] | Yiwen CHEN, Xuelian ZHANG. Carotid Atherosclerosis and Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy in Type 2 Diabetics [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(23): 2843-2848. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||