Chinese General Practice ›› 2022, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (20): 2468-2474.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0030
Special Issue: 睡眠研究最新文章合集; 神经系统疾病最新文章合集; 睡眠问题专题研究; 运动相关研究最新文章合集
• Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2021-11-24
Revised:
2022-04-07
Published:
2022-07-15
Online:
2022-04-28
Contact:
Xin WANG
About author:
通讯作者:
王鑫
作者简介:
基金资助:
组别 | 例数 | 年龄(岁) | 性别〔n(%)〕 | BMI( | 病程( | 脑卒中类型〔n(%)〕 | 病灶侧〔n(%)〕 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
男 | 女 | 脑出血 | 脑梗死 | 左 | 右 | |||||
对照组 | 32 | 65.3±7.0 | 20(62.5) | 12(37.5) | 24.1±2.2 | 0.87±0.63 | 10(31.2) | 22(68.8) | 16(50.0) | 16(50.0) |
试验组 | 32 | 66.0±7.9 | 18(56.2) | 14(43.8) | 24.0±2.2 | 0.99±0.73 | 11(34.4) | 21(65.6) | 19(59.4) | 13(40.6) |
t(χ2)值 | 0.354 | 0.259a | 0.151 | 0.732 | 0.071a | 0.567a | ||||
P值 | 0.725 | 0.611 | 0.880 | 0.467 | 0.790 | 0.451 |
Table 1 Comparison of general data between two groups
组别 | 例数 | 年龄(岁) | 性别〔n(%)〕 | BMI( | 病程( | 脑卒中类型〔n(%)〕 | 病灶侧〔n(%)〕 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
男 | 女 | 脑出血 | 脑梗死 | 左 | 右 | |||||
对照组 | 32 | 65.3±7.0 | 20(62.5) | 12(37.5) | 24.1±2.2 | 0.87±0.63 | 10(31.2) | 22(68.8) | 16(50.0) | 16(50.0) |
试验组 | 32 | 66.0±7.9 | 18(56.2) | 14(43.8) | 24.0±2.2 | 0.99±0.73 | 11(34.4) | 21(65.6) | 19(59.4) | 13(40.6) |
t(χ2)值 | 0.354 | 0.259a | 0.151 | 0.732 | 0.071a | 0.567a | ||||
P值 | 0.725 | 0.611 | 0.880 | 0.467 | 0.790 | 0.451 |
组别 | 例数 | VO2peak(ml·kg-1·min-1) | VO2peak%pred(%) | METpeak | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
康复训练前 | 康复训练12周后 | t配对值 | P值 | 康复训练前 | 康复训练12周后 | t配对值 | P值 | 康复训练前 | 康复训练12周后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
对照组 | 32 | 12.69±3.19 | 12.77±3.27 | 0.360 | 0.721 | 50.94±10.73 | 51.16±11.27 | 0.546 | 0.589 | 3.91±0.90 | 3.91±0.89 | 0.102 | 0.919 |
试验组 | 32 | 12.88±3.07 | 14.48±2.72 | 7.830 | <0.001 | 49.00±10.28 | 57.25±8.64 | 7.415 | <0.001 | 3.82±1.15 | 4.46±0.92 | 6.635 | <0.001 |
t值 | 0.248 | 2.272 | 0.737 | 2.428 | 0.376 | 2.440 | |||||||
P值 | 0.805 | 0.027 | 0.464 | 0.018 | 0.708 | 0.018 | |||||||
组别 | HRpeak(次/min) | 负荷peak(W) | AT(ml·kg-1·min-1) | ||||||||||
康复训练前 | 康复训练12周后 | t配对值 | P值 | 康复训练前 | 康复训练12周后 | t配对值 | P值 | 康复训练前 | 康复训练12周后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
对照组 | 107.09±10.79 | 108.59±12.73 | 1.326 | 0.195 | 50.28±10.05 | 51.87±10.29 | 1.594 | 0.121 | 5.27±2.60 | 5.28±2.45 | 0.013 | 0.989 | |
试验组 | 106.66±9.59 | 119.94±11.12 | 10.411 | <0.001 | 53.06±10.46 | 66.84±10.02 | 10.255 | <0.001 | 6.58±3.89 | 8.32±3.62 | 9.137 | <0.001 | |
t值 | 0.171 | 3.796 | 1.085 | 5.894 | 1.574 | 3.949 | |||||||
P值 | 0.864 | <0.001 | 0.282 | <0.001 | 0.121 | <0.001 | |||||||
组别 | RERpeak | Borg Scale自感劳累分级(呼吸困难)(级) | Borg Scale自感劳累分级(腿部劳累)(级) | ||||||||||
康复训练前 | 康复训练12周后 | t配对值 | P值 | 康复训练前 | 康复训练12周后 | t配对值 | P值 | 康复训练前 | 康复训练12周后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
对照组 | 1.08±0.13 | 1.10±0.13 | 1.833 | 0.076 | 15.59±1.04 | 15.94±1.05 | 1.938 | 0.062 | 15.94±1.32 | 16.19±1.40 | 1.856 | 0.073 | |
试验组 | 1.05±0.11 | 1.05±0.11 | 0.641 | 0.526 | 15.19±1.23 | 12.47±1.50 | 12.841 | <0.001 | 15.59±0.91 | 12.94±1.54 | 12.441 | <0.001 | |
t值 | 1.040 | 1.411 | 1.425 | 10.721 | 1.214 | 8.818 | |||||||
P值 | 0.302 | 0.163 | 0.159 | <0.001 | 0.230 | <0.001 |
Table 2 Comparison of cardiopulmonary fitness between two groups before and after rehabilitation training
组别 | 例数 | VO2peak(ml·kg-1·min-1) | VO2peak%pred(%) | METpeak | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
康复训练前 | 康复训练12周后 | t配对值 | P值 | 康复训练前 | 康复训练12周后 | t配对值 | P值 | 康复训练前 | 康复训练12周后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
对照组 | 32 | 12.69±3.19 | 12.77±3.27 | 0.360 | 0.721 | 50.94±10.73 | 51.16±11.27 | 0.546 | 0.589 | 3.91±0.90 | 3.91±0.89 | 0.102 | 0.919 |
试验组 | 32 | 12.88±3.07 | 14.48±2.72 | 7.830 | <0.001 | 49.00±10.28 | 57.25±8.64 | 7.415 | <0.001 | 3.82±1.15 | 4.46±0.92 | 6.635 | <0.001 |
t值 | 0.248 | 2.272 | 0.737 | 2.428 | 0.376 | 2.440 | |||||||
P值 | 0.805 | 0.027 | 0.464 | 0.018 | 0.708 | 0.018 | |||||||
组别 | HRpeak(次/min) | 负荷peak(W) | AT(ml·kg-1·min-1) | ||||||||||
康复训练前 | 康复训练12周后 | t配对值 | P值 | 康复训练前 | 康复训练12周后 | t配对值 | P值 | 康复训练前 | 康复训练12周后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
对照组 | 107.09±10.79 | 108.59±12.73 | 1.326 | 0.195 | 50.28±10.05 | 51.87±10.29 | 1.594 | 0.121 | 5.27±2.60 | 5.28±2.45 | 0.013 | 0.989 | |
试验组 | 106.66±9.59 | 119.94±11.12 | 10.411 | <0.001 | 53.06±10.46 | 66.84±10.02 | 10.255 | <0.001 | 6.58±3.89 | 8.32±3.62 | 9.137 | <0.001 | |
t值 | 0.171 | 3.796 | 1.085 | 5.894 | 1.574 | 3.949 | |||||||
P值 | 0.864 | <0.001 | 0.282 | <0.001 | 0.121 | <0.001 | |||||||
组别 | RERpeak | Borg Scale自感劳累分级(呼吸困难)(级) | Borg Scale自感劳累分级(腿部劳累)(级) | ||||||||||
康复训练前 | 康复训练12周后 | t配对值 | P值 | 康复训练前 | 康复训练12周后 | t配对值 | P值 | 康复训练前 | 康复训练12周后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
对照组 | 1.08±0.13 | 1.10±0.13 | 1.833 | 0.076 | 15.59±1.04 | 15.94±1.05 | 1.938 | 0.062 | 15.94±1.32 | 16.19±1.40 | 1.856 | 0.073 | |
试验组 | 1.05±0.11 | 1.05±0.11 | 0.641 | 0.526 | 15.19±1.23 | 12.47±1.50 | 12.841 | <0.001 | 15.59±0.91 | 12.94±1.54 | 12.441 | <0.001 | |
t值 | 1.040 | 1.411 | 1.425 | 10.721 | 1.214 | 8.818 | |||||||
P值 | 0.302 | 0.163 | 0.159 | <0.001 | 0.230 | <0.001 |
组别 | 例数 | 主观睡眠质量〔M(P25,P75)〕 | 睡眠潜伏期( | 睡眠持续性( | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
康复训练前 | 康复训练12周后 | Z值 | P值 | 康复训练前 | 康复训练12周后 | t配对值 | P值 | 康复训练前 | 康复训练12周后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
对照组 | 32 | 2.0(1.5,2.0) | 2.0(1.0,2.0) | -1.181 | 0.238 | 1.97±0.74 | 1.78±0.79 | 1.982 | 0.056 | 2.06±0.76 | 1.91±0.78 | 1.539 | 0.134 |
试验组 | 32 | 2.0(1.5,2.0) | 1.0(0,1.0) | -4.435 | <0.001 | 2.03±0.74 | 1.38±0.49 | 5.685 | <0.001 | 2.03±0.74 | 1.47±0.57 | 4.447 | <0.001 |
t(Z)值 | -0.365a | -5.186a | 0.338 | 2.464 | 0.167 | 2.573 | |||||||
P值 | 0.715 | <0.001 | 0.737 | 0.017 | 0.868 | 0.012 | |||||||
组别 | 习惯性睡眠效率( | 睡眠紊乱( | 使用睡眠药物( | ||||||||||
康复训练前 | 康复训练12周后 | t配对值 | P值 | 康复训练前 | 康复训练12周后 | t配对值 | P值 | 康复训练前 | 康复训练12周后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
对照组 | 2.31±0.64 | 2.09±0.69 | 1.752 | 0.090 | 2.13±0.87 | 2.09±0.89 | 0.273 | 0.786 | 2.09±0.69 | 2.06±0.72 | 0.297 | 0.768 | |
试验组 | 2.28±0.63 | 1.91±0.53 | 2.339 | 0.026 | 2.22±0.66 | 1.69±0.47 | 4.477 | <0.001 | 2.03±0.82 | 1.66±0.65 | 2.436 | 0.021 | |
t(Z)值 | 0.196 | 1.220 | 0.486 | 2.276 | 0.330 | 2.372 | |||||||
P值 | 0.846 | 0.227 | 0.629 | 0.027 | 0.743 | 0.021 | |||||||
组别 | 白天功能紊乱( | PSQI总分( | |||||||||||
康复训练前 | 康复训练12周后 | t配对值 | P值 | 康复训练前 | 康复训练12周后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||||||
对照组 | 2.16±0.68 | 2.31±0.74 | 1.222 | 0.231 | 14.50±3.31 | 13.87±2.60 | 1.679 | 0.103 | |||||
试验组 | 2.13±0.71 | 1.03±0.65 | 7.568 | <0.001 | 14.59±3.01 | 9.69±1.71 | 9.919 | <0.001 | |||||
t(Z)值 | 0.181 | 7.387 | 0.118 | 7.610 | |||||||||
P值 | 0.857 | <0.001 | 0.906 | <0.001 |
Table 3 Comparison of the total score of PSQI and scores of its seven domains between two groups before and after rehabilitation training
组别 | 例数 | 主观睡眠质量〔M(P25,P75)〕 | 睡眠潜伏期( | 睡眠持续性( | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
康复训练前 | 康复训练12周后 | Z值 | P值 | 康复训练前 | 康复训练12周后 | t配对值 | P值 | 康复训练前 | 康复训练12周后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
对照组 | 32 | 2.0(1.5,2.0) | 2.0(1.0,2.0) | -1.181 | 0.238 | 1.97±0.74 | 1.78±0.79 | 1.982 | 0.056 | 2.06±0.76 | 1.91±0.78 | 1.539 | 0.134 |
试验组 | 32 | 2.0(1.5,2.0) | 1.0(0,1.0) | -4.435 | <0.001 | 2.03±0.74 | 1.38±0.49 | 5.685 | <0.001 | 2.03±0.74 | 1.47±0.57 | 4.447 | <0.001 |
t(Z)值 | -0.365a | -5.186a | 0.338 | 2.464 | 0.167 | 2.573 | |||||||
P值 | 0.715 | <0.001 | 0.737 | 0.017 | 0.868 | 0.012 | |||||||
组别 | 习惯性睡眠效率( | 睡眠紊乱( | 使用睡眠药物( | ||||||||||
康复训练前 | 康复训练12周后 | t配对值 | P值 | 康复训练前 | 康复训练12周后 | t配对值 | P值 | 康复训练前 | 康复训练12周后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
对照组 | 2.31±0.64 | 2.09±0.69 | 1.752 | 0.090 | 2.13±0.87 | 2.09±0.89 | 0.273 | 0.786 | 2.09±0.69 | 2.06±0.72 | 0.297 | 0.768 | |
试验组 | 2.28±0.63 | 1.91±0.53 | 2.339 | 0.026 | 2.22±0.66 | 1.69±0.47 | 4.477 | <0.001 | 2.03±0.82 | 1.66±0.65 | 2.436 | 0.021 | |
t(Z)值 | 0.196 | 1.220 | 0.486 | 2.276 | 0.330 | 2.372 | |||||||
P值 | 0.846 | 0.227 | 0.629 | 0.027 | 0.743 | 0.021 | |||||||
组别 | 白天功能紊乱( | PSQI总分( | |||||||||||
康复训练前 | 康复训练12周后 | t配对值 | P值 | 康复训练前 | 康复训练12周后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||||||
对照组 | 2.16±0.68 | 2.31±0.74 | 1.222 | 0.231 | 14.50±3.31 | 13.87±2.60 | 1.679 | 0.103 | |||||
试验组 | 2.13±0.71 | 1.03±0.65 | 7.568 | <0.001 | 14.59±3.01 | 9.69±1.71 | 9.919 | <0.001 | |||||
t(Z)值 | 0.181 | 7.387 | 0.118 | 7.610 | |||||||||
P值 | 0.857 | <0.001 | 0.906 | <0.001 |
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] | |
[5] |
中华医学会神经病学分会,中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组. 中国各类主要脑血管病诊断要点2019[J]. 中华神经科杂志,2019,52(9):710-715. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-7876.2019.09.003.
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM's resource manual for guildelines for exercise testing and prescription[M]. 7th ed. Philadelphia,PA:Wolters Kluwer and Lippincott Williams & Wilkins,2014.
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] | |
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
刘娜,王佳. 康复护理对于脑卒中后遗症期患者心理状态及生活质量的影响研究[J]. 检验医学与临床,2019,16(9):1287-1289. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-9455.2019.09.041.
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[1] | QIN Fengyin, ZHANG Qishan, LAI Jinjia, HUANG Yimin, HAN Guoyin, SUN Xinglan, WANG Fen, TAN Yibing. Current Status and Influencing Factors of the Intention to Screen for High-risk Stroke among Community Residents in Guangdong [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(34): 4283-4289. |
[2] | SU Kaiqi, LYU Zhuan, WU Mingli, LUO Meng, GAO Jing, NIE Chenchen, LIU Hao, FENG Xiaodong. Effect of Electroacupuncture on BDNF/TrkB/PI3K/Akt Pathway and Hippocampal Neuronal Protection in Rats with Learning and Memory Impairment after Ischemia Reperfusion [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(33): 4187-4193. |
[3] | YIN Miaomiao, CUI Liling, LI Yaqing, WANG Liqun, ZHANG Yue, WU Jialing. Effect of Dual Task on Walking Ability in Posterior Circulation Ischemic Stroke Patients with Vestibular Symptoms [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(33): 4207-4212. |
[4] | YANG Yuxuan, ZHANG Han, DU Juan, WANG Lingling, XIE Yulei, YIN Kaiming, ZHANG Bo. Value of an Dynamic Eye-tracking Task in Assessing Unilateral Spatial Neglect after Stroke [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(32): 4020-4025. |
[5] | JIAN Qiufeng, XU Ronghua, YAO Qian, ZHOU Yuanyuan. A Meta-analysis of the Prevalence and Influencing Factors of Post-stroke Cognitive Impairment in Chinese Elderly Patients [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(32): 4070-4079. |
[6] | ZHU Lin, GUO Yankui, GAO Chen, CHEN Xuezhi, WANG Fashuai. Efficacy of Western Medicine, Chinese Patent Medicine and Their Combination on Post-stroke Insomnia: a Network Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(30): 3823-3832. |
[7] | XIAO Yuqian, BAI Yanjie, WANG Yan, CHEN Shuying, CHEN Limin, SUN Kexin, WAN Jun. Research Progress of Mitochondrial Transfer in Post-stroke Cognitive Impairment [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(30): 3833-3840. |
[8] | LIU Yue, LIU Qi, DONG Hui, LIU Yaling. Neuropsychological Changes of Cognitive Reverters after Stroke Based on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) with a Double Threshold [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(27): 3417-3422. |
[9] | TIAN Meng, SONG Yulei, ZHANG Xueqing, MA Yunyun, LIANG Xiao, SHI Jiarui, YIN Haiyan, LUO Dan, XU Guihua, BAI Yamei. Latent Profile Analysis of Sleep Subtypes in Older Adults with Subjective Cognitive Decline and Its Influencing Factors [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(26): 3297-3302. |
[10] | ZHENG Siting, HE Chunyu, ZHOU Jun, KONG Ye, YANG Xinyao, ZHOU Haiying, WEI Xiaofei. Summary of Best Evidence for Self-Management of Patients with Motor Dysfunction after Stroke [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(26): 3230-3237. |
[11] | Expert group of expert consensus on the application of ulinastatin in common clinical critical illness. Expert Consensus on the Application of Ulinastatin in Common Clinical Critical Illness [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(26): 3207-3219. |
[12] | WANG Xiaowen, XIAO Tongling, WANG Yi, YANG Ying, XIA Xiaoshuang, LI Xin. Relationship between Homocysteine Level and Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(26): 3290-3296. |
[13] | DU Yuying, WANG Cailing, CUI Senlin, LEI lei, WANG Yanping, SONG Xueqin, HAN Shuqin, ZHANG Yanmei, WANG Baolan, HUANG Haixia, CHEN Mi, YAN Huirong, LI Dong, ZHANG Jingjing, REN Yu. Analysis of Appropriate Technology Promotion for Stroke Rehabilitation in Southern Xinjiang [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(25): 3178-3184. |
[14] | ZHANG Guoqing, TONG Tingting, WANG Ying, LI Kuiwu, ZHANG Lida, WU Xiaoqing, LI Chenglong, WANG Junli, ZHANG Junyu, HAN Wei. Effect and Mechanism of Tongdu Tiaoshen Electroacupuncture Pretreatment-mediated MiR-124-3p/GSK-3β/Cyp-D Signaling Pathway on Mitochondrial Permeability Transition Pore in Cerebral Cortex of Rats with Cerebral Ischemia-reperfusion Injury [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(24): 3050-3060. |
[15] | SHEN Huiwen, LIN Yongzhong, CHEN Shuliang, ZHANG Lihong, MA Chunye, MA Deyuan, ZHANG Ce. Precise Thrombolytic Treatment for Stroke Using AI-based Algorithms: a Real-world Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(17): 2070-2077,2088. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 819
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 915
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||