Content of Research on General Practice Work in our journal

        Published in last 1 year |  In last 2 years |  In last 3 years |  All
    Please wait a minute...
    For Selected: Toggle Thumbnails
    Adapting the Depression Component of WHO Mental Health Gap Intervention Guide (mhGAP-IG.v2) for Primary Care in Shenzhen, China: a Delphi Study
    Searle Kendall, Blashki Grant, Kakuma Ritsuko, YANG Hui, LYU Shurong, LI Baoqi, XIAO Yingying, Minas Harry
    Chinese General Practice    2024, 27 (01): 15-26.   DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0852
    Abstract251)   HTML3)    PDF(pc) (1717KB)(132)       Save
    Background

    Primary care doctors in Shenzhen, China are increasingly expected to identify and prevent depressive disorder; however, they have received limited mental health training and community healthcare centres (CHCs) do not provide standardised protocols for the diagnosis and care of depressive disorder. The World Health Organization's mental health gap intervention guide, version 2 (mhGAP-IG.v2) is a decision support tool for non-specialists for the assessment, management and follow-up of mental, neurological and substance use disorders (including depressive disorder). Given that mhGAP-IG.v2 is a generic tool, it requires adaptation to take account of cultural differences in depression presentation and unique characteristics of China's emergent mental health system.

    Methods

    A two-round, web-based, Delphi survey was conducted. A panel of primary care doctors from Shenzhen, were invited to score their level of agreement with 199 statements (arranged across 10 domains) proposing changes to the content and structure of mhGAP-IG.v2 for use in Shenzhen. Consensus was predefined as 80% panelists providing a rating of either "somewhat agree/definitely agree", or "definitely disagree/somewhat disagree" on a five-point scale for agreement.

    Results

    79% of statements received consensus with a mean score of 4.26 (i.e. "somewhat agree"). Agreed adaptations for mhGAP-IG.v2 included: an assessment approach which considers a broader spectrum of depression symptoms and reflects the life course of disease; incorporating guidance for screening tool usage; clarifying physicians' roles and including referral pathways for intersectorial care with strong family involvement; aligning drug treatment with national formularies; stronger emphasis of suicide prevention throughout all sections of the guide; contextualizing health education; reflecting a person-centred approach to care. Panelists chose to maintain diagnostic and treatment advice for bipolar patients experiencing a depressive episode as in the current guide.

    Conclusion

    An adapted mhGAP-IG.v2 for depression recognises China's cultural and contextual needs for assessment guidance; unique primary healthcare system organization, priorities and treatment availability; and diverse psychosocial educational needs. An adapted mhGAP-IG.v2 could both inform the future training programs for primary care in Shenzhen and also offer an additional mental health resource for non-specialists in other countries.

    Table and Figures | Reference | Related Articles | Metrics
    Common Foreign Quality Evaluation Tools of Primary Health Care and Their Implications for China
    LIU Lidi, LIAO Xiaoyang, ZHAO Qian, GUO Yiming, WEN Yuqi, LIU Changming, FANG Xiang
    Chinese General Practice    2024, 27 (01): 27-35.   DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0054
    Abstract333)   HTML19)    PDF(pc) (1703KB)(259)       Save

    Primary health care (PHC) is the bottom of the health care system, and its quality not only relates to the construction of hierarchical medical system, but also affects the health level of residents. Scientific and reasonable evaluation of PHC quality is the cornerstone of quality improvement, however, a unified and standardized quality evaluation system of PHC has not been developed in China. Therefore, the international quality evaluation tools of PHC are classified into four categories based on the evaluation focus: quality evaluation tools based on PHC connotations, quality evaluation tools emphasizing the functional characteristics of PHC, quality evaluation tools based on the perceptions of demand and/or supply side stakeholders, and other disease-specific tools or indicator systems. The content and characteristics of each tool were introduced and compared separately, their applicability and shortcomings were analyzed, and the evolution was reviewed, in order to provide reference for the construction of PHC quality evaluation tools in China.

    Table and Figures | Reference | Related Articles | Metrics