
Chinese General Practice ›› 2025, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (17): 2156-2162.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2024.0316
• Original Research • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2024-06-10
Revised:2024-09-10
Published:2025-06-15
Online:2025-04-22
Contact:
CAO Tianran
通讯作者:
曹天然
作者简介:作者贡献:
刘青芳负责实验设计、文章的构思与设计,并对文章负责;曹天然组织课题实施、控制实验质量,负责论文起草、论文修订与审校;韦有仕、肖斐、周春香进行动物实验以及相关指标检测;刘群、袁慧负责论文数据整理和统计学分析。
基金资助:CLC Number:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2024.0316
| 组别 | 只数 | 第1天 | 第2天 | 第3天 | 第4天 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照组 | 12 | 88.15±8.13 | 52.74±6.17 | 25.62±4.47 | 11.92±3.28 |
| 模型组 | 12 | 90.89±8.37 | 73.34±12.24a | 58.29±6.10a | 41.29±3.56a |
| 麦角硫因组 | 12 | 87.72±7.15 | 55.18±9.13b | 28.21±3.14b | 15.21±4.82b |
| 麦角硫因+ML385组 | 12 | 91.53±11.26 | 65.37±10.42c | 44.54±5.09c | 32.12±2.35c |
| F值 | 0.562 | 12.260 | 121.754 | 178.712 | |
| P值 | 0.643 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 1 Comparison of escape latency of rats in each group during training
| 组别 | 只数 | 第1天 | 第2天 | 第3天 | 第4天 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照组 | 12 | 88.15±8.13 | 52.74±6.17 | 25.62±4.47 | 11.92±3.28 |
| 模型组 | 12 | 90.89±8.37 | 73.34±12.24a | 58.29±6.10a | 41.29±3.56a |
| 麦角硫因组 | 12 | 87.72±7.15 | 55.18±9.13b | 28.21±3.14b | 15.21±4.82b |
| 麦角硫因+ML385组 | 12 | 91.53±11.26 | 65.37±10.42c | 44.54±5.09c | 32.12±2.35c |
| F值 | 0.562 | 12.260 | 121.754 | 178.712 | |
| P值 | 0.643 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| 组别 | 只数 | 目标象限停留时间百分比 |
|---|---|---|
| 对照组 | 12 | 33.47±6.84 |
| 模型组 | 12 | 16.43±3.16a |
| 麦角硫因组 | 12 | 28.49±5.2b |
| 麦角硫因+ML385组 | 12 | 20.48±6.27c |
| F值 | 22.951 | |
| P值 | <0.001 |
Table 2 Comparison of the percentage of residence time in the target quadrant of rats in each group
| 组别 | 只数 | 目标象限停留时间百分比 |
|---|---|---|
| 对照组 | 12 | 33.47±6.84 |
| 模型组 | 12 | 16.43±3.16a |
| 麦角硫因组 | 12 | 28.49±5.2b |
| 麦角硫因+ML385组 | 12 | 20.48±6.27c |
| F值 | 22.951 | |
| P值 | <0.001 |
| 组别 | 只数 | 神经元凋亡率 |
|---|---|---|
| 对照组 | 6 | 7.24±1.35 |
| 模型组 | 6 | 33.15±5.74a |
| 麦角硫因组 | 6 | 18.02±2.57b |
| 麦角硫因+ML385组 | 6 | 25.27±4.61c |
| F值 | 52.786 | |
| P值 | <0.001 |
Table 3 Comparison of neuronal apoptosis rate in brain tissue of rats in each group
| 组别 | 只数 | 神经元凋亡率 |
|---|---|---|
| 对照组 | 6 | 7.24±1.35 |
| 模型组 | 6 | 33.15±5.74a |
| 麦角硫因组 | 6 | 18.02±2.57b |
| 麦角硫因+ML385组 | 6 | 25.27±4.61c |
| F值 | 52.786 | |
| P值 | <0.001 |
| 组别 | 只数 | NRF2 | HO-1 | NQO1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照组 | 6 | 0.74±0.09 | 0.39±0.06 | 0.93±0.12 |
| 模型组 | 6 | 0.18±0.04a | 0.08±0.03a | 0.16±0.04a |
| 麦角硫因组 | 6 | 0.56±0.09b | 0.29±0.05b | 0.72±0.09b |
| 麦角硫因+ML385组 | 6 | 0.28±0.05c | 0.16±0.04c | 0.33±0.06c |
| F值 | 38.943 | 26.338 | 553.854 | |
| P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 4 Comparison of expression levels of NRF2、HO-1 and NQO1 proteins in hippocampal tissue of rats
| 组别 | 只数 | NRF2 | HO-1 | NQO1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照组 | 6 | 0.74±0.09 | 0.39±0.06 | 0.93±0.12 |
| 模型组 | 6 | 0.18±0.04a | 0.08±0.03a | 0.16±0.04a |
| 麦角硫因组 | 6 | 0.56±0.09b | 0.29±0.05b | 0.72±0.09b |
| 麦角硫因+ML385组 | 6 | 0.28±0.05c | 0.16±0.04c | 0.33±0.06c |
| F值 | 38.943 | 26.338 | 553.854 | |
| P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| 组别 | 只数 | SOD (U/mg) | GSH-Px (nmol/mL) | MDA (nmol/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照组 | 6 | 12.15±2.25 | 22.41±5.22 | 12.09±1.37 |
| 模型组 | 6 | 5.12±1.20a | 12.38±3.02a | 28.45±2.20a |
| 麦角硫因组 | 6 | 11.58±2.33b | 18.45±1.06b | 16.44±1.30b |
| 麦角硫因+ML385组 | 6 | 8.45±1.03c | 12.88±1.08c | 24.19±2.11c |
| F值 | 19.463 | 14.245 | 101.915 | |
| P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 5 Comparison of SOD,GSH-Px and MDA levels in hippocampus of rats in each group
| 组别 | 只数 | SOD (U/mg) | GSH-Px (nmol/mL) | MDA (nmol/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照组 | 6 | 12.15±2.25 | 22.41±5.22 | 12.09±1.37 |
| 模型组 | 6 | 5.12±1.20a | 12.38±3.02a | 28.45±2.20a |
| 麦角硫因组 | 6 | 11.58±2.33b | 18.45±1.06b | 16.44±1.30b |
| 麦角硫因+ML385组 | 6 | 8.45±1.03c | 12.88±1.08c | 24.19±2.11c |
| F值 | 19.463 | 14.245 | 101.915 | |
| P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| 组别 | 只数 | IL-1β | TNF-α | IL-6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照组 | 6 | 0.85±0.21 | 1.26±0.14 | 1.12±0.25 |
| 模型组 | 6 | 2.54±1.02a | 2.29±0.35a | 2.86±0.38a |
| 麦角硫因组 | 6 | 1.11±0.94b | 1.36±0.29b | 1.38±0.27b |
| 麦角硫因+ML385组 | 6 | 2.41±0.52c | 2.08±0.18c | 2.49±0.37c |
| F值 | 8.139 | 24.528 | 40.952 | |
| P值 | 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 6 Comparison of IL-1β,TNF-α and IL-6 levels in hippocampal tissues of rats in each group
| 组别 | 只数 | IL-1β | TNF-α | IL-6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照组 | 6 | 0.85±0.21 | 1.26±0.14 | 1.12±0.25 |
| 模型组 | 6 | 2.54±1.02a | 2.29±0.35a | 2.86±0.38a |
| 麦角硫因组 | 6 | 1.11±0.94b | 1.36±0.29b | 1.38±0.27b |
| 麦角硫因+ML385组 | 6 | 2.41±0.52c | 2.08±0.18c | 2.49±0.37c |
| F值 | 8.139 | 24.528 | 40.952 | |
| P值 | 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
李福章.经常吃蘑菇可以降低认知障碍的概率[J].家庭医学(上半月),2019(9):1.
|
| [25] |
张锐虎,姚茹,史泽雅,等. 莲心碱通过抑制NF-κB激活Nrf2/HO-1通路发挥抗炎抗氧化作用[J]. 中国实验动物学报,2022,30(2):191-197. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-4847.2022.02.006.
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
刘凤,刘增长. 茯苓酸通过激活Nrf2/HO-1信号通路改善OX-LDL诱导的人脐静脉内皮细胞损伤[J]. 中国免疫学杂志,2020,36(2):164-168,179. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-484X.2020.02.007.
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [1] | NIE Qianqian, CHENG Guirong, SONG Dan, LI Jingyao, XU Lang, ZHANG Lijuan. Study on the Relationship between Hypertension and Its Comorbidity and Dementia in Chinese Community-dwelling Older Adults [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(01): 76-83. |
| [2] | CHEN Wei, SU Mingyang, HUANG Deqing, ZHUO Guifeng, ZHU Xiaomin, ZHANG Jinzhi, FU Yulan, LI Zhongtong, JIANG Lingfei. Effect of Yifei Xuanfei Jiangzhuo Prescription on Autophagy Regulation Mechanism of AMPK/mTOR/ULK1 Signaling Pathway in Vascular Dementia Rats [J]. Chinese General Practice, 0, (): 0-. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||