Chinese General Practice ›› 2024, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (03): 280-285.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0306
Special Issue: 女性健康最新文章合集; 中医最新文章合集
• Original Research • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2023-06-01
Revised:
2023-08-02
Published:
2024-01-20
Online:
2023-10-23
Contact:
BAI Wenpei
通讯作者:
白文佩
作者简介:
基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0306
体检项目 | 基线 | 3年后 | t配对值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
腰围(cm) | 76.31±7.25 | 77.91±7.62 | -5.120 | <0.001 |
BMI(kg/m2) | 23.2±3.0 | 23.3±3.2 | -0.297 | 0.767 |
UA(μmol/L) | 261.71±48.84 | 279.91±58.11 | -8.916 | <0.001 |
TC(mmol/L) | 4.76±0.59 | 5.01±0.76 | -7.885 | <0.001 |
TG(mmol/L) | 1.02±0.38 | 1.22±0.71 | -6.054 | <0.001 |
FBG(mmol/L) | 5.24±0.56 | 5.16±0.65 | 3.820 | <0.001 |
HDL-C(mmol/L) | 1.49±0.28 | 1.46±0.30 | 0.306 | 0.760 |
LDL-C(mmol/L) | 2.78±0.58 | 2.87±0.68 | -2.072 | 0.039 |
Table 1 Follow-up results of research subjects
体检项目 | 基线 | 3年后 | t配对值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
腰围(cm) | 76.31±7.25 | 77.91±7.62 | -5.120 | <0.001 |
BMI(kg/m2) | 23.2±3.0 | 23.3±3.2 | -0.297 | 0.767 |
UA(μmol/L) | 261.71±48.84 | 279.91±58.11 | -8.916 | <0.001 |
TC(mmol/L) | 4.76±0.59 | 5.01±0.76 | -7.885 | <0.001 |
TG(mmol/L) | 1.02±0.38 | 1.22±0.71 | -6.054 | <0.001 |
FBG(mmol/L) | 5.24±0.56 | 5.16±0.65 | 3.820 | <0.001 |
HDL-C(mmol/L) | 1.49±0.28 | 1.46±0.30 | 0.306 | 0.760 |
LDL-C(mmol/L) | 2.78±0.58 | 2.87±0.68 | -2.072 | 0.039 |
组别 | 人数 | 腰围(cm) | BMI(kg/m2) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
基线 | 3年后 | t配对值 | P值 | 基线 | 3年后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
未绝经组 | 176 | 75.76±6.78 | 77.62±7.47 | -3.806 | <0.001 | 23.0±2.8 | 23.2±3.1 | -0.755 | 0.451 |
绝经组 | 291 | 76.66±7.53 | 78.09±7.72 | -3.682 | <0.001 | 23.3±3.2 | 23.3±3.2 | 0.357 | 0.722 |
t值 | 1.189 | 0.574 | 0.921 | 0.409 | |||||
P值 | 0.235 | 0.566 | 0.358 | 0.683 |
Table 2 Comparison of waist circumference and BMI between the two groups
组别 | 人数 | 腰围(cm) | BMI(kg/m2) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
基线 | 3年后 | t配对值 | P值 | 基线 | 3年后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
未绝经组 | 176 | 75.76±6.78 | 77.62±7.47 | -3.806 | <0.001 | 23.0±2.8 | 23.2±3.1 | -0.755 | 0.451 |
绝经组 | 291 | 76.66±7.53 | 78.09±7.72 | -3.682 | <0.001 | 23.3±3.2 | 23.3±3.2 | 0.357 | 0.722 |
t值 | 1.189 | 0.574 | 0.921 | 0.409 | |||||
P值 | 0.235 | 0.566 | 0.358 | 0.683 |
组别 | 人数 | UA(μmol/L) | TC(mmol/L) | TG(mmol/L) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
基线 | 3年后 | t配对值 | P值 | 基线 | 3年后 | t配对值 | P值 | 基线 | 3年后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
未绝经组 | 176 | 260.09±50.07 | 268.69±58.34 | -2.897 | 0.004 | 4.74±0.58 | 4.85±0.66 | -2.932 | 0.004 | 1.02±0.39 | 1.19±0.55 | -4.836 | <0.001 |
绝经组 | 291 | 262.69±48.13 | 286.69±57.00 | -8.935 | <0.001 | 4.77±0.60 | 5.10±0.79 | -7.543 | <0.001 | 1.02±0.38 | 1.25±0.79 | -4.577 | <0.001 |
t值 | 0.556 | 3.278 | 0.573 | 3.521 | 0.005 | 0.804 | |||||||
P值 | 0.578 | 0.001 | 0.567 | <0.001 | 0.996 | 0.422 | |||||||
组别 | FBG(mmol/L) | HDL-C(mmol/L) | LDL-C(mmol/L) | ||||||||||
基线 | 3年后 | t配对值 | P值 | 基线 | 3年后 | t配对值 | P值 | 基线 | 3年后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
未绝经组 | 5.20±0.57 | 5.15±0.65 | 1.213 | 0.227 | 1.47±0.31 | 1.45±0.32 | 0.173 | 0.863 | 2.77±0.58 | 2.76±0.58 | 0.435 | 0.664 | |
绝经组 | 5.26±0.55 | 5.17±0.66 | 1.803 | 0.072 | 1.50±0.27 | 1.47±0.29 | 0.259 | 0.796 | 2.80±0.58 | 2.95±0.73 | -2.881 | 0.005 | |
t值 | 1.132 | 0.283 | 0.787 | 0.740 | 0.423 | 2.823 | |||||||
P值 | 0.258 | 0.777 | 0.432 | 0.460 | 0.672 | 0.005 |
Table 3 Comparison of laboratory examination indexes between the two groups
组别 | 人数 | UA(μmol/L) | TC(mmol/L) | TG(mmol/L) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
基线 | 3年后 | t配对值 | P值 | 基线 | 3年后 | t配对值 | P值 | 基线 | 3年后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
未绝经组 | 176 | 260.09±50.07 | 268.69±58.34 | -2.897 | 0.004 | 4.74±0.58 | 4.85±0.66 | -2.932 | 0.004 | 1.02±0.39 | 1.19±0.55 | -4.836 | <0.001 |
绝经组 | 291 | 262.69±48.13 | 286.69±57.00 | -8.935 | <0.001 | 4.77±0.60 | 5.10±0.79 | -7.543 | <0.001 | 1.02±0.38 | 1.25±0.79 | -4.577 | <0.001 |
t值 | 0.556 | 3.278 | 0.573 | 3.521 | 0.005 | 0.804 | |||||||
P值 | 0.578 | 0.001 | 0.567 | <0.001 | 0.996 | 0.422 | |||||||
组别 | FBG(mmol/L) | HDL-C(mmol/L) | LDL-C(mmol/L) | ||||||||||
基线 | 3年后 | t配对值 | P值 | 基线 | 3年后 | t配对值 | P值 | 基线 | 3年后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
未绝经组 | 5.20±0.57 | 5.15±0.65 | 1.213 | 0.227 | 1.47±0.31 | 1.45±0.32 | 0.173 | 0.863 | 2.77±0.58 | 2.76±0.58 | 0.435 | 0.664 | |
绝经组 | 5.26±0.55 | 5.17±0.66 | 1.803 | 0.072 | 1.50±0.27 | 1.47±0.29 | 0.259 | 0.796 | 2.80±0.58 | 2.95±0.73 | -2.881 | 0.005 | |
t值 | 1.132 | 0.283 | 0.787 | 0.740 | 0.423 | 2.823 | |||||||
P值 | 0.258 | 0.777 | 0.432 | 0.460 | 0.672 | 0.005 |
组别 | 人数 | CIMT增厚 | 高血压 |
---|---|---|---|
未绝经组 | 176 | 11(6.3) | 9(5.1) |
绝经组 | 291 | 20(6.9) | 32(11.0) |
χ2值 | 0.069 | 4.739 | |
P值 | 0.793 | 0.029 |
Table 4 Comparison of the incidence of increased CIMT and hypertension between the two groups
组别 | 人数 | CIMT增厚 | 高血压 |
---|---|---|---|
未绝经组 | 176 | 11(6.3) | 9(5.1) |
绝经组 | 291 | 20(6.9) | 32(11.0) |
χ2值 | 0.069 | 4.739 | |
P值 | 0.793 | 0.029 |
自变量 | CIMT增厚 | 高血压 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | SE | Wald χ2值 | P值 | OR(95%CI) | β | SE | Wald χ2值 | P值 | OR(95%CI) | |
绝经 | 0.258 | 0.441 | 0.343 | 0.558 | 1.295(0.545~3.075) | 0.271 | 0.360 | 0.564 | 0.452 | 1.311(0.647~2.654) |
年龄≥50岁 | 0.906 | 0.438 | 4.285 | 0.038 | 2.475(1.049~5.838) | 0.525 | 0.350 | 2.257 | 0.133 | 1.691(0.852~3.355) |
Table 5 Multivariate Logistic regression analysis of the effect of menopause and age on the incidence of increased CIMT and hypertension in middle-aged women
自变量 | CIMT增厚 | 高血压 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | SE | Wald χ2值 | P值 | OR(95%CI) | β | SE | Wald χ2值 | P值 | OR(95%CI) | |
绝经 | 0.258 | 0.441 | 0.343 | 0.558 | 1.295(0.545~3.075) | 0.271 | 0.360 | 0.564 | 0.452 | 1.311(0.647~2.654) |
年龄≥50岁 | 0.906 | 0.438 | 4.285 | 0.038 | 2.475(1.049~5.838) | 0.525 | 0.350 | 2.257 | 0.133 | 1.691(0.852~3.355) |
[1] |
|
[2] |
中华医学会妇产科学分会绝经学组. 中国绝经管理与绝经激素治疗指南2023版[J]. 中华妇产科杂志,2023,58(1):4-21. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20221118-00706.
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
中华医学会心血管病学分会介入心脏病学组,中华医学会心血管病学分会动脉粥样硬化与冠心病学组,中国医师协会心血管内科医师分会血栓防治专业委员会,等. 稳定性冠心病诊断与治疗指南[J]. 中华心血管病杂志,2018,46(9):680-694. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2018.09.004.
|
[5] |
陈中国,朱晓丽,万宇婷,等. 颈动脉内膜中层厚度与冠心病的相关性分析[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志,2019,7(1):31-34. DOI:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2019.01.006.
|
[6] |
罗兰,牛敏,高政南. 中心性肥胖及血糖异常与颈动脉内膜-中层厚度的相关性[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志,2019,11(3):196-200. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-5809.2019.03.007.
|
[7] |
陈波,杨万勇,石新年,等. Hcy、Cyst C、RPB4和颈动脉内膜中层厚度检测在健康体检中预防作用的研讨[J]. 国际医药卫生导报,2020,26(3):314-317. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2020.03.006.
|
[8] |
国家卫生健康委员会疾病预防控制局,国家心血管病中心,中国医学科学院阜外医院,等. 中国高血压健康管理规范(2019)[J]. 中华心血管病杂志,2020,48(1):10-46. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2020.01.004.
|
[9] | |
[10] |
中华医学会妇产科学分会绝经学组. 围绝经期异常子宫出血诊断和治疗专家共识[J]. 协和医学杂志,2018,9(4):313-319. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.2018.04.006.
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
张莹,杜鑫,李劼,等. 血清超敏C反应蛋白水平与颈动脉内膜中层厚度的相关性分析[J]. 中国综合临床,2021,37(1):26-30. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn101721-20200712-00010.
|
[1] | FAN Jing, WEI Shan, LI Liqiu, ZHENG Xiuli, LI Yan, NIU Jianying, WANG Ling, XU Chengyan. Investigation on the Incidence and Influencing Factors of Proteinuria and Renal Dysfunction in Community-dwelling Elderly Population [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(09): 1048-1053. |
[2] | XU Yanan, LI Wenjuan, ZHAO Shuqin, TANG Yuji, YUAN Fuqiang, ZHAO Kunpeng. A Qualitative Study on the Social Isolation Experience of Young and Middle-aged Patients with Schizophrenia in Remission [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(09): 1088-1094. |
[3] | ZENG Lingcong, ZHANG Longju, ZHOU Ling, ZHANG Wei, DAI Meng, HUANG Yin, HUANG Yi. Analysis of the Predictive Value of 4-level Clinical Pretest Probability Score in Elderly Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(09): 1062-1067. |
[4] | WANG Xueting, JIANG Yi. Disease Burden of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in the BRICS Countries from 1990 to 2019 [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(09): 1118-1125. |
[5] | HAN Junjie, WU Di, CHEN Zhisheng, XIAO Yang, SEN Gan. A Nomogram Prediction Model and Validation Study on the Risk of Complicated Diabetic Nephropathy in Type 2 Diabetes Patients [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(09): 1054-1061. |
[6] | Schizophrenia Coordination Group, Chinese Society of Psychiatry, Chinese Society of General Practice, LI Qian, SI Tianmei. Benefits of Community-based Treatment for Patients with Schizophrenia: Based on Long-acting Injectable Antipsychotic Agents [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(09): 1021-1027. |
[7] | WANG Kai, XU Baichao, WANG Zhaoxin, SU Jianjiao. Effects of Combined Motion Intervention on Body Composition, Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Cardiopulmonary Fitness of Obese Female Adolescents [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(09): 1109-1117. |
[8] | ZHAO Yuan, LIU Shanghong, ZHANG Yanfang, MA Lixu, LI Hong, LI Xiaohua, TIAN Yuan, GUO Zhongqin, LIANG Peifeng. Characteristics of Gender, Age, Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Stroke Hospitalization Cases Based on the Data of 190 000 Patients in Ningxia Region [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(08): 915-920. |
[9] | PENG Yilun, LI Yang, WANG Xiaotao. Study on the Mechanisms of Multiple Myeloma Cells Promoting M2 Macrophage Polarization through PI3K/AKT Signaling Pathway [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(08): 978-984. |
[10] | WANG Chang, QUAN Yawen, WANG Linfeng, LI Gang. Correlation of Platelet Distribution Width with Different Hypertension Subtypes in Elderly Males and Females [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(08): 921-929. |
[11] | ZHOU Yujie, LIU Huanting, WAN Chonghua, GAN Qihui, XIAO Junhui, LIU Yuxi. Research on the Relationship between Well-being and Personality Traits in the Elderly Based on Canonical Correlation Analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(08): 955-960. |
[12] | ZHANG Yafang, WEN Xuan, YANG Zhongting, DU Xingmei, DENG Chunyan, YE Qingyun, DENG Rui, HUANG Yuan. Impact of Household Income Levels on Successful Aging of the Elderly [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(08): 930-935. |
[13] | ZHAO Fengyi, LI Xin, ZHAN Xiaokai, ZHANG Jiajia, SHEN Man, TANG Ran, FAN Sibin, HUANG Zhongxia. Survival and Prognosis Analysis of Bortezomib Based Regimen in Newly Diagnosed Super-aged Multiple Myeloma Patients [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(08): 971-977. |
[14] | YUAN Yuan, ZHANG Yarong, LI Zhengang, ZHANG Li. Risk Factors of Prone Position Ventilation-related Facial Pressure Injuries and the Selection of Best Modeling Method [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(08): 948-954. |
[15] | ZHANG Yuan, DONG Jingjing, LIAN Nannan, LIU Yun. Quality Evaluation on Integrated Elderly Care and Medical Services Based on the Perspective of Differences between Public and Private Nursing Institutions [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(07): 822-828. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||